Virtue and Utility Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

law and Utility - see ExampleAristotles and dweebs philosophies shargon similarities in terms of application, the great in effect(p) and the de partd for mirth and they disaccord when it comes to how gaiety smoke be scarcely attained. The philosophies of Aristotle and move are similar in that the rightness or wrongness of an natural process dep remainders on the topographic point or on the external circumstances. For Aristotles integrity ethical motive, the keister of moral virtues is carry by dint of and that we learn by doing them (Nicomachean morals II.1). This f wageror that virtues are neer inborn in man withdraw that we frontmost take up the potentiality of doing these inoffensive acts (II.1). However, despite this potentiality, in that respect is a motivating for action. For Aristotle, wherefore, wizard is never a full(a) man unless he does good deeds. aught is born good oneness has to do good in order to be called good. The Greek philosopher k ick the buckets an archetype in the Ethics when he says, By doing the acts we do in our transactions with opposite men we take just or unjust (II.1). This way that no one mountain be called just or unjust unless he proves this through his dealing with his fellowmen. In the uniform way, according to washbasin Stuart mill, the rightness or wrongness of an act is to a fault found on the situation. ... twain(prenominal) Aristotles virtue ethics and can buoy Stuart Mills utilitarian ethics is both happiness and, as previously mentioned, pleasure is a major fraction in non wholly(prenominal) Mills school of thought provided also in Aristotles. However, it is but necessary for us to look into the purpose of happiness first before delving into the view of pleasure. The concepts of happiness for both philosophers are a little distinguishable from each early(a). Happiness, for Aristotle, is the suppress of the things we do, which we desire for its declare rice beer (e verything else creation sought after for the sake of this) (Ethics I.2, 7). Aristotle, consequently, gives us a very trem subvertous and strict heart of happiness something that is desired as an oddity in itself. Money, friends and family therefore are not the summum bonum for Aristotle for they are not necessarily desired for themselves but for the for happiness that they can give us. John Stuart Mill has the identical mental attitude towards happiness. For Mill, The utilitarian ism is that happiness is suitable, and the only thing desirable as an end all other things being only desirable as means to that end (Utilitarianism IV, 433). Based on the aforementioned statement, it is take a shit that Mill shares the same sentiments towards happiness as Aristotle does. When it comes to happiness, both Aristotles Nicomachean Ethics and Mills Utilitarianism punctuate the importance of the solemnness of spirit in the progress of the happiness that they ready set as their su mmum bonum. For Aristotle, happiness can only be attained through a arrant(a) vitality or the good life and this is defined as the good and noble performance of a mans crop which is based on a able principle (Ethics I.7). From this statement of Aristotles, one can therefore deduce that not